Alan J. Pakula is one of the American filmmakers who intrigues me. Although he is half a generation older, he debuted as a director around the same time as Spielberg or Scorsese, but he did not keep up with them. He was a producer, director and screenwriter, and in each of these fields he had peak moments among banal or even bad films. His filmography as a director includes only 16 films which are uneven in value. Of them, ‘All the President’s Men’ (1976) is certainly a peak. ‘Comes a Horseman‘ is the film that followed, two years later, in 1978 and Pakula‘s only attempt at the western genre. I had not had the opportunity to see it before and I was very curious. The differences are visible and disappointing.
The story takes place in the state of Colorado, in the mid-1940s, towards the end of World War II. The soldiers return from the front, the lucky ones trying to resume their lives, others in coffins. The scene that opens the film is a funeral – that of the son of a big farmer named Ewing who controls almost the entire area between the mountains where the story takes place. The only person who opposes him is Ella, the heiress of a smaller farm. There was an old conflict between her father and Ewing, and Ella’s attempt to continue raising cattle herds on the inherited land stands in the way of the tycoon’s dominance. The banks and oil companies that begin prospecting in the area are also interested and involved in this conflict. The appearance of Frank, a discharged soldier who had bought a small plot of land from Ella will complicate the story.
The film has only a few characters, and therefore there is enough time for their development. The historical period would be America after the war and at the beginning of the economic boom, but almost none of those have any role. The narative structure is that of a classic western, and the story could very well have taken place 40 or 80 years earlier, if we ignore the cars or small planes that occasionally show up in the setting. The law of the strongest dominates and the heroes ultimately resolve their conflicts in a violent style. Everything is somewhat predictable, including the inevitable romantic story. James Caan, Jane Fonda and Jason Robards were good actors and their performances are more than decent, but that’s about it. The most interesting scenes in the film seemed to me to be the ones in which the cowboys chase and capture wild cattle – spectacular and well-framed in the surrounding nature. Were these the main reason why Alan J. Pakula made this film? Or maybe he wanted to make his point in a period in the history of American cinema when there was talk of the ‘death of the western’? In my opinion, ‘Comes a Horseman‘ is lacking passion and inspiration. It’s not the worse film in the director’s career, but it’s also far from being among the best or most interesting.